Cognitive reasoning assessment
Train numerical, inductive and deductive reasoning together: 24 questions in 36 minutes.
Choose a fixed or adaptive mock in English, French or German.
Reasoning practice →COM/AST/112/2026 · AST2
Preparation for Commission staff: cognitive reasoning, EU knowledge, written assignments and oral presentation. Applications have closed.
Applications closed: 30 October 2026, 12:00 Brussels time · 50 reserve-list places
| Test | Questions / tasks | Time limit | Pass threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive reasoning assessment | 24 | 36 min | At least the 40th percentile |
| EU knowledge | 30 | 40 min | 15/30 |
| Written work | 1 | 90 min | 25/50 |
| Oral presentation and interview | — | 60 min | 25/50 |
Among candidates who pass the EU knowledge test, up to 125 of the highest scorers have their written work marked. Final eligibility checks follow the ranking of candidates who pass the written test until 75 qualify. The best oral results among those who pass determine the reserve list. Ties at the cutoff can increase these numbers.
The notice does not name an assessment provider. Cognitive practice is preparation, and a practice percentage is not an official percentile result.
Train numerical, inductive and deductive reasoning together: 24 questions in 36 minutes.
Choose a fixed or adaptive mock in English, French or German.
Reasoning practice →Study EU institutions, the Commission’s powers under the Treaties, its governance, procedures, decision-making and policy priorities.
Timed practice uses the shared Commission question bank. Aim above 15/30: ranking determines whose written work is marked.
EU knowledge →Sit the 40-minute EU knowledge mock and go straight to the 90-minute written exercise in the same language. Review the two results after writing.
Pick a case, work against the clock, then score your performance against the model.
The dossier or panel prompts open when you start.
You support a Commission unit organising a hybrid workshop for Member State officials. Write a short decision note to your head of unit. Recommend a date and format, then propose actions with owners and deadlines. Set a 90-minute timer.
Decision requested: confirm Thursday as a hybrid workshop. Thursday accommodates all 22 in-person and 24 online participants, provided captions are secured. Tuesday has five too few seats for in-person attendees and no remote equipment. Two registrants cannot attend Thursday. Today: the unit coordinator provisionally confirms Thursday with Facilities and asks the accessibility coordinator to request captions before noon tomorrow. Facilities confirms the room before 16:00 tomorrow. After the date is confirmed, the registration team updates invitations, explains remote access and follows up with the two unavailable registrants. If captions cannot be provided, escalate before releasing invitations.
Check whether your note compares both days, identifies the capacity and accessibility constraints, and puts the caption request and booking confirmation in a workable order. Mark any assumption as such.
Practice score /50
Pick a case, work against the clock, then score your performance against the model.
The dossier or panel prompts open when you start.
Your unit is preparing a Commission initiative. Explain the purpose of public consultation and how it differs from internal consultation between services. Then answer the panel.
Ask a partner to chair the panel. Suggested rehearsal: 10 minutes to prepare, 10 for the presentation, 15 for questions, 25 for the interview. Keep answers brief enough to allow follow-up.
How would you handle a large number of identical submissions? How can the unit show how it considered input without promising to adopt every suggestion?
Why AST2? Describe a time you learned a new tool, explained a complex process clearly, met competing deadlines and worked with a team that disagreed with yours.
Public consultation gathers evidence and views from people and organisations. Interservice consultation lets Commission services comment on a draft internally. Log submissions consistently and distinguish unique arguments from repeated endorsements. Summarise themes and explain how evidence affected the proposal. Give a concrete example of a neutral summary you could prepare as an assistant.
Make the distinction early. In the interview, describe an actual outcome and how you would apply the lesson in an AST2 role.
Practice score /50
Eligible categories: Commission officials and temporary staff in AST/SC or AST, and contract staff in FG III–IV. Service requirements: six consecutive full months in those categories and twelve in the Commission; contract staff also need 36 Commission months, not necessarily consecutive.
The notice gives no test dates. Check your invitation. The EU knowledge MCQ and written assignment take place online on the same day.
Education routes: a post-secondary diploma; a secondary diploma giving access to post-secondary education plus three years of relevant experience after that diploma; or certified vocational training equivalent to post-secondary education. Check recognition rules in the notice.
All tests use Language 2: English, French or German. It must differ from your main language in Sysper unless you document C1 in a different official EU language as Language 1. The minimum levels are C1 for Language 1 and B2 for Language 2.
The Commission’s internal notice COM/AST/112/2026 and candidate instructions are binding. Consult Staff Centre and My Communications in the Single Candidate Portal for updates.
Checked: November 4, 2026.